Can Twitter Really Change the World?

riots_02

Rioting in Egypt

When you think back to Occupy Wall Street, can you recount any longstanding changes that were a direct response to this outcry? I can remember it clearly in Philadelphia- going for my run through City Hall and having to avoid the whole area for weeks or else run in the middle of an active protest.  But did they change anything? Does the world have less inequality?

Occupy-WS-Philly

Occupy Philadelphia at City Hall

In an intriguing article by NY Times writer Zeynep Tufekci,  she examines the use of social media to incite riots at the face of injustice and compares it to the “old” way of doing things, coming to the conclusion that maybe expediency and far-reaching posts aren’t the answer to deliver long-standing results.

Tufekci discusses recent mass demonstrations which were fueled by Twitter and Facebook.  Liked minded people see the message and rush off to the site of gathering to show their support.  It may last a day, a week, a month or in the case of Egypt, several years.  But what happens afterwards is her focus for this article.  People dissipate, they go back to what they were doing because in many cases there is no clear leadership or marching orders, and the momentum dies.

When thinking back to the 60’s when people actually did change the world, there were months of planning that went into a single protest.  Leadership was assembled well in advance, strategies were in place and people accomplished the uncompromisable.

“By the time the United States government was faced with the March on Washington in 1963, the protest amounted to not just 300,000 demonstrators but the committed partnerships and logistics required to get them all there — and to sustain a movement for years against brutally enforced Jim Crow laws. That movement had the capacity to leverage boycotts, strikes and demonstrations to push its cause forward.”

This article was a refreshing wake up call.  It reminds us that the internet is not the absolute answer to the balance of life, which is easy to forget when deluged with screens in every aspect of living.  There is something to be said about grassroots organizing, long-term planning and the power of human to human contact. That is not to say that Twitter or Facebook are not powerful tools that can be used for good, but they simply do not make up for the human organizing factors that led protests and marches many moons ago, when they did change the world for the better.

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Can Twitter Really Change the World?

  1. thesoos1 says:

    Agree completely. It is about the critical thinking and realizing that anything that is worth changing takes a concerted effort and coordinated strategy:-)

  2. sydhavely says:

    Totally agree. I went twice to the Philadelphia City Hall encampment of Occupy Wall Street and felt the same thing. I tried to engage people but felt that they were looking at me as one of the 1 per cent. I then happened to bump into one of the cops there who saw the interaction and he said, “They’re that way with everyone, even us and we actually support them.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s